About your Search

20121202
20121210
Search Results 0 to 1 of about 2
. >> schieffer: as the two sides look for answers on that, u.n. ambassador susan rice returned to capitol hill, trying to satisfy republican concerns about what happened in that attack in libya that left an american ambassador and three other americans dead. >> the concerns i have are greater today that they were before. >> schieffer: we'll hear from senator lindsey graham. and then we'll talk to the intelligence committee chairs in the house and senate, congressman mike rogers, and senator dianne feinstein. on page two, we'll get analysis on where the argument over the fiscal cliff goes. and the consequences if congress fails to get agreement. we'll talk to maya macguineas, head of the campaign to fix the debt. mark zandi of "moody's "analytics. and our own john dicker sen. captioning sponsored by cbs from cbs news in washington, "face the nation" with bob schieffer. >> schieffer: and good morning again. treasurer treasury secretary tim geithner laid out the emotion's opening offer on how to fix the debt. it wasn't what the republicans want to hear. basically geithner said no waw to cut a dea
, and them you go to an administration spokesman was support out, and it was susan rice, the u.n. ambassador, who had nothing tiger woods any of this-nothing to do with any of this, and she was given talking points as it were that didn't seem to jibe with what the intelligence committee knew or what the classified versions said. i still can't get that straight in my head how that's the right thing to do. should they have not sent a spokesman out? should they have said we can't answer those questions? the whole thing just doesn't seem right to me? >> because it's not right, bob. you cannot have the intelligence reading one way-- now, it's not a crime for the president, the administration, to take a different political narrative than what the intelligence said. that's not a crime. but it certainly is irresponsible, and in many cases may have risen to the level of nigigence, because that narrative created other problems and other bad decision after the 9/11 attack. and so, it really is beyond the talking point, it's beyond rice, because it was a political narrative designed not around what the
Search Results 0 to 1 of about 2

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)